The findings of the GLOBE study served to help organizations and societies understand what made an effective or ineffective leader. Many leadership behaviors are similar across societies, pointing out that no matter the cultural difference or society in which a leader is from, there are specific leadership behaviors that are viewed as effective. The GLOBE project was significant in indicating how cultures perceive effective and ineffective leadership, which is helpful to leaders in facilitating intercultural interactions.
The study revealed six global leadership behaviors, which were used in the study to understand how the clusters perceived leadership. These six are charismatic/value-based, team-oriented, participative, humane-oriented, autonomous, and self-protective. Using their understanding of leadership behaviors and perceptions of leadership from each cluster group, the researchers were able to identify a leadership profile for each cluster. Table 3.7 and Table 3.8 list the six leadership behaviors and their characteristics as well as the leadership profile for each cluster.
Globe Dimension |
One Extreme |
Other Extreme |
Uncertainty avoidance |
Need for established social norms, rituals, and practices |
Comfortable with ambiguity and predictability |
Power distance |
Egalitarian and nonhierarchal |
Hierarchy, authority, disparity in status and wealth |
Institutional collectivism |
Collective actions and sharing of resources encouraged |
Individual actions and goals are encouraged |
In-group collectivism |
Expressions of pride, loyalty, and cohesion |
Noncohesiveness, loyal to oneself and one’s needs |
Gender egalitarianism |
Nurture, care, relationships, sharing |
Ambition, assertiveness, control |
Assertiveness |
Assertive, confrontational, and aggressive in social relationships |
Timid, submissive, and tender in social relationships |
Future orientation |
Planning, investing, and delays of individual or collective gratification |
Spontaneity, enjoying the present |
Performance orientation |
Encourages and rewards group performance and excellence |
No rewards and encouragement for goals; more relaxed in terms of achievement |
Adapted from House et al. (2002) The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
The study also highlighted the perceptions of cultures related to universally desirable and undesirable attributes in leaders. The desirable attributes were viewed as characteristics that were valued and that facilitated the leadership processes. Undesirable attributes were viewed as obstacles and challenges to effective leadership. Table 3.9 illustrates the positive and negative attributes of effective leadership.
Cluster |
Countries |
Anglo |
Canada, United States, Australia, Ireland, England, South Africa (White sample), New Zealand |
Confucian Asia |
Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, China, South Korea, Japan |
Eastern Europe |
Greece, Hungary, Albania, Slovenia, Poland, Russia, Georgia, Kazakhstan |
Germanic Europe |
Austria, The Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany-East, Germany-West |
Latin America |
Ecuador, El Salvador, Colombia, Bolivia, Brazil, Guatemala, Argentina, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Mexico |
Latin Europe |
Israel, Italy, Switzerland (French-speaking), Spain, Portugal, France |
Middle East |
Turkey, Kuwait, Egypt, Morocco, Qatar |
Nordic Europe |
Denmark, Finland, Sweden |
Southern Asia |
Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, India, Thailand, Iran |
Sub-Saharan Africa |
Zimbabwe, Namibia, Zambia, Nigeria, South Africa (Black sample) |
Adapted from House et al. (2002) The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Cultural Dimension |
High-Score Cluster |
Low-Score Cluster |
Uncertainty avoidance |
Germanic Europe |
Eastern Europe, Latin America |
Nordic Europe |
Middle East |
|
Power/hierarchy |
No Clusters |
Nordic Europe |
Institutional collectivism |
Nordic Europe |
Germanic Europe, Latin America |
Confucian Asia |
Latin Europe |
|
In-Group collectivism |
Confucian Asian, Eastern Europe |
Anglo, Germanic Europe |
Latin America, Middle East Southern Asia |
Nordic Europe |
|
Gender |
Eastern Europe |
Middle East |
Nordic Europe |
Adapted from House et al. (2002) The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Dimension |
Behaviors |
Charismatic/value-based leadership |
Inspires others, motivates, expect high performance; visionary, self-sacrificing, trustworthy, decisive |
Team-oriented leadership |
Team-building, common purpose, collaborative, integrative, diplomatic, not malevolent |
Participative leadership |
Participative and not autocratic; inclusive of others |
Humane-oriented leadership |
Supportive, considerate, compassionate and generous; modesty and sensitivity |
Autonomous leadership |
Independent and individualistic; autonomous and unique |
Self-protective leadership |
Ensures the safety and security of the leader and the group; self-centered, status conscious, face-saving, conflict-inducing |
Adapted from House et al. (2002) The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Business leaders have tremendous power to change the organizational culture by utilizing several methods that address the underlying assumptions, beliefs, and values of its members; however, this is not an easy task. Culture, as explained, is oftentimes manifest in unconscious behaviors, values, and assumptions that develop over time and change as new employees enter an organization. The significance of the GLOBE study is that it helps leaders to understand the role of culture in leadership. By understanding one’s culture, as well as that of others, it brings you to awareness of different perceptions of leadership and how cultures come to understand leaders. Recognizing the elements in leadership and culture enables you to leverage the differences that cultures create and to use that to create positive intercultural growth.
Cluster |
1st |
2nd |
3rd |
4th |
5th |
6th |
Eastern Europe |
Autonomous |
Self- protective |
Charismatic |
Team Oriented |
Humane |
Participative |
Latin America |
Charismatic |
Team |
Self- protective |
Participative |
Humane |
Autonomous |
Latin Europe |
Charismatic |
Team |
Participative |
Self- protective |
Humane |
Autonomous |
Confucian Asia |
Self- protective |
Team |
Humane |
Charismatic |
Autonomous |
Participative |
Nordic Europe |
Charismatic |
Participative |
Team |
Autonomous |
Humane |
Self- protective |
Anglo |
Charismatic |
Participative |
Humane |
Team |
Autonomous |
Self- protective |
Sub-Sahara Africa |
Humane |
Charismatic |
Team |
Participative |
Self- protective |
Autonomous |
Southern Asia |
Self- protective |
Charismatic |
Humane |
Team |
Autonomous |
Participative |
Germanic Europe |
Autonomous |
Charismatic |
Participative |
Humane |
Team |
Self- protective |
Middle East |
Self- protective |
Humane |
Autonomous |
Charismatic |
Team |
Participative |
Adapted from House et al. (2002) The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Desirable Leadership Attributes |
Undesirable Leadership Attributes |
Trustworthy |
Loner |
Just |
Asocial |
Honest |
Noncooperative |
Foresight |
Irritable |
Plans ahead |
Nonexplicit |
Encouraging |
Egocentric |
Positive |
Ruthless |
Dynamic |
Dictatorial |
Motivational |
|
Builds confidence |
|
Intelligent |
|
Dependable |
|
Team builder |
|
Communicator |
Adapted from House et al. (2002) The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
- 6040 reads