您在這裡

Burden of Proof in a Criminal Prosecution

5 十月, 2015 - 17:23

The prosecution’s burden of proof in a criminal case is the most challenging burden of proof in law; it is beyona reasonabldoubt. Judges have struggled with a definition for this burden of proof. As Chief Justice Shaw stated nearly a century ago, [w]hat is reasonable doubt? It is a term often used, probably pretty well understood, but not easily defined. It is not mere possible doubt; because every thing relating to human affairs, and depending on moral evidence, is open to some possible or imaginary doubt. It is that state of the case, which, after the entire comparison and consideration of all the evidence, leaves the minds of jurors in that condition that they cannot say they feel an abiding conviction, to a moral certainty, of the truth of the charge. 1

In general, the prosecution’s evidence must overcome the defendant’spresumption of innocence, which the Constitution guarantees as due process of law. 2 This fulfills the policy of criminal prosecutions, which is to punish the guilty, not the innocent. If even a slight chance exists that the defendant is innocent, the case most likely lacks convincing and credible evidence, and the trier of fact should acquit the defendant.

States vary as to their requirements for the defendant’s burden of proof when asserting a defense in a criminal prosecution. 3 Different defenses also have different burdens of proof, as is discussed in detail in Criminal Defenses, Part 1 and Criminal Defenses, Part 2. Some states require the defendant to meet the burden of production, but require the prosecution to thereafter meet the burden of persuasion, disproving the defense to a preponderance of evidence or, in some states, beyond a reasonable doubt. Other states require the defendant to meet the burden of production and the burden of persuasion. In these states, the defendant’s standard is typically preponderance of evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant does not always have to prove a defense in a criminal prosecution. If the prosecution does not meet the burden of proof, the defendant is acquitted without having to present any evidence at all.