You are here


15 January, 2016 - 09:21
Available under Creative Commons-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Download for free at

Developing a quality innovative program is not an easy task. It is an ongoing process that requires creativity, flexibility, collaboration, reflection, analysis, and response to public, institutional, and student concerns. There is a great deal of overlap and hence commonality in professional standards among the three disciplines. It is important for program faculty and instructors to be cognizant of similarities and differences between standards and ensure that required knowledge and skills are addressed and assessed. The foundational knowledge presented in the MPA program is regularly recommended and required of anyone in a leadership position, whether it is in education, government, a nonprofit organization, or in the corporate world. Educational, non-profit, government, and for-profit organizations are not isolated in the world beyond academia. Members of these organizations interact, work together, and depend upon each other on a regular basis. What better way can there be than to prepare these future leaders together and for professors to model the integration and interactions in practice? The University of Michigan-Dearborn is doing just that in their Masters of Public Administration program.


Beyer, B., & Ruhl-Smith, C. (2000). Research and collaboration as keys to improved performance. Journal of the Intermountain Center for Education Effectiveness. 1(2), 35-40.

Bolman L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2004).Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Capasso, R. L. & Daresh, J. C. (2001). The school administrator internship handbook: Leading, mentoring, and participating in the internship program. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Council of Chief State School Officers.(1996). Interstate school leaders consortium: Standards for school leadership. Washington, DC: Author.

Cunningham, W. G., & Cordeiro, P. A. (2000). Educational administration: 8 problem-based approachs. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Dell'Angela, T. & Washburn, G. (2004). Daley set to remake troubled schools. (2004, June 25). Chicago Tribune, pp. A1. A22.

Grossman, Kate N. (2004). Daley unveils plan to shut some schools to copy success stories. (2004, June 25). Chicago Sun-Times, METRO, p. 20.

Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1984). The management of organizational behavior (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1996). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Hoyle, J. R., English, F. W., & Steffy, B. E. (1998). Skills for successful 21st century school leaders: Standards for peak performance. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Kimbrough, R. B., & Nunnery, M. Y. (1988). Educational administration: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Lambert, L. (1995). Cultivating leaders. Association for California School Administrators. 24(5), 6-9. Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2000). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomas Learning.

McFarland, L.J., Senn, L. E., & Childress, J. R. (1994). 21st century leadership: Dialogues with 100 top leaders. New York: The Leadership Press.

Milstein, M., & Associates (1993). Changing the wav we prepare educational leaders: The Danforth experience. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organizations. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1993). Restructuring schooling: Learning from ongoing efforts. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Murphy, J., Hawley, W., & Young, M. ( 2005). Re-defining the education of school leaders. NCPEA Education Leadership Review. 6(2), 48-55.

National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (1993). Principals for our changing schools: Knowledge and skill base. Fairfax, VA: Author.

Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A Schools. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.

Peterson, K. D., & Finn, C. E. (1985, Spring). Principals, superintendents, and the administrator's art. The Public Interest, (79), 127-131.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (3rd ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Rodriguez, F. J. (2000, Spring). Interdisciplinary leadership in the Americas: Vision, risk, and change. Journal of the Intermountain Center for Education Effectiveness. 1(2), 64-71

Sergiovanni, T. J. Burlingame, M., Coombs, F.S. & Thurston, P.W. (1999). Educational governance and administration (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Seyfarth, J.T. (1999) The principal: New leadership for new challenges. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Silver, P. (1983). Educational administration: Theoretical perspectives on practice and research. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.

Starratt, R. J. (1996). Transforming educational administration: Meaning, community, and excellence. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Technology Standards for School Administrators Collaborative (TSSA) (2004). Retrieved from 

U. S. Government (2002). No child left behind act of 2001: Reauthorization of the elementary and secondary education act of 1965 (P.L 107-110). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Wilmore, E. L. (2002). Principal leadership: Applying the new educational leadership constituent council (ELCC) standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.