您在這裡

Game-specific rules

15 六月, 2015 - 16:02
Available under Creative Commons-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/383d4b87-2d7b-454e-99fe-2eaa43eae8ff@20.20

Is x ∨ y ∨ z a tautology? Clearly not. Setting the three propositions each to false, the formula is false. But now consider: Is A has 0 A has 1 A has 2 a tautology? The answer here is " yes of course, ... well, as long we're interpreting those propositions to refer to a WaterWorld board. " We'll capture this notion by listing a bunch of domain axioms for WaterWorld: formulas which are true for all WaterWorld boards.

There are a myriad of domain axioms which express the rules of WaterWorld. Here are a few of them:

  • A − has − 0 ⇒ B − safe ∧ G − safe
  • A − has − 2 ⇒ B − unsafe ∧ G − unsafe
  • ...

A more complete list is here (Section 6.5.2: The domain axioms). Whenever we deal with WaterWorld, we implicitly take all these domain axioms as given.