Available under Creative Commons-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/f6522dce-7e2b-47ac-8c82-8e2b72973784@7.2
Hello, I think that there are a number of reasons to move forward regardless of the fact that we do not have universal access. This issue also came up in Kim Tucker's posting on the series. Here are a few reasons of the top of my head.
- The more content that is available the more demand that will exist for investing in creating pockets of access.
- The more content that it available, the more raw source materials there are to support the OER ecosystem.
- The more digital materials are available them more content there is available to convert to useable media (video, paper, CD, etc.) in the meantime.
What are some of the other reasons to push forward?
- 1106 reads
