
There were a number of comments that range across a fairly wide range of topics, which included:
- Educational models that separate materials development and instructional capacity leveraging OER.
- The roles of technology in open education.
- Prior learning, OER, and vocational competency standards.
- Can OER impact Higher Education?
- Can OER change the nature or structure of higher ed institutions in general?
- Can OER impact Human Development?
- Impact of localization, reuse, and re-release.
- General disappointment and confusion over the real impact and role of OER in educational programming and human development.
- Confusion of the nature and substance of a "community" of OER practitioners and users.
- Notions about general direction, descried as establishing base-line commitments that serve as a “magnetic north.”
Thanks again to Christine for her interesting and insightful post and responses. I also want to extend a big thank you to Steve Foerster, “sehrmann,” Leigh Blackall, “prawstho,” “jsener,” and “Femina” for making this a great exchange, and other folks who have been reading along. The schedule of guest authors for the next 5 moths is great. On March 1st, Amee Godwin of OER Commons will be posting, which will be fantastic. The schedule for the series can be found on WikiEducator 2 .
Please feel free to continue this dialog!!
Comments on Summary
- 1094 reads