When we consider the much more realistic situation when we have a channel that introduces attenuation and noise, we can make use of the just-described receiver's linear nature to directly
derive the receiver's output. The attenuation affects the output in the same way as the transmitted signal: It scales the output signal by the same amount. The white noise, on the other hand,
should be filtered from the received signal before demodulation. We must thus insert a bandpass filter having bandwidth 2*W* and center frequency *f _{c}*: This filter
has no effect on the received signal-related component, but does remove out-of-band noise power. As shown in the triangular-shaped signal spectrum (Figure 6.6), we apply coherent receiver to this filtered signal, with the result that the demodulated
output contains noise that cannot be removed: It lies in the same spectral band as the signal.

As we derive the signal-to-noise ratio in the demodulated signal, let's also calculate the signal-to-noise ratio of the bandpass filter's output The signal component of equals *αA _{c}m (t)* cos

*(2πf*

_{c}t)**.**This signal's Fourier transform equals

(6.33)

making the power spectrum,

(6.34)

**Exercise 6.12.1**

If you calculate the magnitude-squared of the first equation, you don't obtain the second unless you make an assumption. What is it?

Thus, the total signal-related power in is The noise power equals the integral of
the noise power spectrum; because the power spectrum is constant over the transmission band, this integral equals the noise amplitude *N*_{0} times the filter's bandwidth
2*W* . The so-called received signal-to-noise ratio the signal-to-noise ratio after the de rigeur front-end bandpass filter and before demodulation equals

(6.35)

The demodulated signal Clearly, the signal power equalsTo determine the noise power, we must understand how the coherent demodulator afects the bandpass noise found in Because we are concerned with noise, we must deal with the power spectrum
since we don't have the Fourier transform available to us. Letting *P (f)* denote the power spectrum of 's noise component, the power spectrum after multiplication by the carrier has the form

(6.36)

The delay and advance in frequency indicated here results in two spectral noise bands falling in the low-frequency region of lowpass filter's passband. Thus, the total noise power in this filter's output equalsThe signal-to-noise ratio of the receiver's output thus equals

(6.37)

Let's break down the components of this signal-to-noise ratio to better appreciate how the channel and the transmitter parameters affect communications performance. Better performance, as
measured by the **SNR**, occurs as it increases.

- More transmitter power increasing
*A*increases the signal-to-noise ratio proportionally._{C } - The carrier frequency
*f*has no effect on SNR, but we have assumed that_{c}*f*_{c}_{ }»*W*. - The signal bandwidth
*W*enters the signal-to-noise expression in two places: implicitly through the signal power and explicitly in the expression's denominator.**If the signal spectrum had****a constant****amplitude**as we increased the bandwidth, signal power would increase proportionally. On the other hand, our transmitter enforced the criterion that signal amplitude was constant (Communication with Satellites). Signal amplitude essentially equals the integral of the magnitude of the signal's spectrum.

*NOTE*: This result isn't exact, but we do know that

Enforcing the signal amplitude specification means that as the signal's bandwidth increases we must decrease the spectral amplitude, with the result that the signal power remains constant. Thus, increasing signal bandwidth does indeed decrease the signal-to-noise ratio of the receiver's output.

- Increasing channel attenuation moving the receiver farther from the transmitter decreases the signal-to-noise ratio as the square. Thus, signal-to-noise ratio decreases as distance-squared between transmitter and receiver.
- Noise added by the channel adversely affects the signal-to-noise ratio.

In summary, amplitude modulation provides an effective means for sending a bandlimited signal from one place to another. For wireline channels, using baseband or amplitude modulation makes
little difference in terms of signal-to-noise ratio. For wireless channels, amplitude modulation is the only alternative. The one AM parameter that does not affect signal-to-noise ratio is the
carrier frequency *f*_{c}: We can choose any value we want so long as the transmitter and receiver use the
same value. However, suppose someone else wants to use AM and chooses the same carrier frequency. The two resulting transmissions will add, and **both** receivers will
produce the sum of the two signals. What we clearly need to do is talk to the other party, and agree to use separate carrier frequencies. As more and more users wish to use radio, we need a
forum for agreeing on carrier frequencies and on signal bandwidth. On earth, this forum is the government. In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) strictly controls
the use of the electromagnetic spectrum for communications. Separate frequency bands are allocated for commercial AM, FM, cellular telephone (the analog version of which is AM), short wave
(also AM), and satellite communications.

**Exercise 6.12.2**

Suppose all users agree to use the same signal bandwidth. How closely can the carrier frequencies be while avoiding communications crosstalk? What is the signal bandwidth for commercial AM? How does this bandwidth compare to the speech bandwidth?

- 10680 reads