You are here

Comments

15 January, 2016 - 09:28
Available under Creative Commons-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/f6522dce-7e2b-47ac-8c82-8e2b72973784@7.2

There were a number of comments that range across a fairly wide range of topics, which included:

  • Educational models that separate materials development and instructional capacity leveraging OER.
  • The roles of technology in open education.
  • Prior learning, OER, and vocational competency standards.
  • Can OER impact Higher Education?
  • Can OER change the nature or structure of higher ed institutions in general?
  • Can OER impact Human Development?
  • Impact of localization, reuse, and re-release.
  • General disappointment and confusion over the real impact and role of OER in educational programming and human development.
  • Confusion of the nature and substance of a "community" of OER practitioners and users.
  • Notions about general direction, descried as establishing base-line commitments that serve as a “magnetic north.”
1

Thanks again to Christine for her interesting and insightful post and responses. I also want to extend a big thank you to Steve Foerster, “sehrmann,” Leigh Blackall, “prawstho,” “jsener,” and “Femina” for making this a great exchange, and other folks who have been reading along. The schedule of guest authors for the next 5 moths is great. On March 1st, Amee Godwin of OER Commons will be posting, which will be fantastic. The schedule for the series can be found on WikiEducator 2 .

    Please feel free to continue this dialog!!

    Comments on Summary