
The natural logarithm is the function that undoes the exponential. In a situation like this, we have
where on the left we're thinking of as a function of
, and on the right we consider
to be a function of
.
Applying this to the natural logarithm,





This is noteworthy because it shows that there must be an exception to the rule that the derivative of is
, and the integral of
is
. (In The chain rule I remarked that this rule could be proved using the product rule for negative integer values of
, but that I would give a simpler, less tricky, and more general proof later. The proof is Example below.) The integral of
is not
, which wouldn't make sense anyway because it involves division by zero. 1 Likewise the derivative of
is
, which is zero. Figure 2.12 shows the idea. The functions xn form a kind of ladder, with
differentiation taking us down one rung, and integration taking us up. However, there are two special cases where differentiation takes us of the ladder entirely.
Example
Prove for any real value of
, not just an integer.
By the chain rule,
(For , the result is zero.)
When I started the discussion of the derivative of the logarithm, I wrote right of the bat. That meant I was implicitly assuming
was positive. More generally, the derivative of
equals
, regardless of the sign (see Problem 2.29 ).
- 瀏覽次數:2604